van der Heide T, Temmink R, Fivash G, Bouma T, Boström C, Diddere, K, Esteban N, Gaeckle J, Gagnon K, Infantes E, van der Koppel J, Lengkeek W, Unsworth R, Christianen MC,
Biological Conservation, 264: 109373.
Publication year: 2021
Tjisse van der Heide conducting seagrass research at Kristineberg marine station in Sweden.
Tjisse van der Heide

Abstract

Coastal ecosystems provide vital ecosystem functions and services, but have been rapidly degrading due to human impacts. Restoration is increasingly considered key to reversing these losses, but is often unsuccessful. Recent work on seagrasses and salt marsh cordgrasses highlights that restoration yields can be greatly enhanced by temporarily mimicking key emergent traits. These traits are not expressed by individual seedlings or small clones, but emerge in clumped individuals or large clones to locally suppress environmental stress, causing establishment thresholds where such density- dependent self-facilitation is important for persistence. It remains unclear, however, to what extent the efficacy of restoration via emergent trait-based mimicry depends on the intensity of stressors.

We test this in a restoration experiment with the temperate seagrass Zostera marina at four sites (Finland, Sweden, UK, USA) with contrasting hydrodynamic regimes, where we simulated dense roots mats or vegetation canopies with biodegradable structural mimics (BESE).

Results show that by mimicking sediment- stabilizing root mats, seagrass transplant survival, growth and expansion was strongly enhanced in hydrodynamically exposed environments. However, these positive effects decreased and turned negative under benign conditions, while mimics insufficiently mitigated physical stress in extremely exposed environments, illustrating upper and lower limits of the application. Furthermore, we found that aboveground structures, designed to mimic stiff rather than flexible vegetation canopies, underperformed compared to belowground mimics.

Our findings emphasize the importance of understanding the conditions at the restoration site, species-specific growth requirements, and self-facilitating traits that organisms may express when applying emergent trait-mimicry as a tool to improve restoration success.

Cite as: van der Heide T, Temmink R, Fivash G, Infantes E, Gagnon K, Boström C, Gaeckle J, Unsworth R, Esteban N, Lengkeek W, Didderen K, Bouma TJ, van de Koppel J, Christianen MJA. (2022) Coastal restoration success via emergent trait-mimicry is context dependent. Biological Conservation, 264: 109373. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109373

Highlights

  • Emergent trait mimicry can enhance restoration success: Mimicking traits like dense root mats improves seagrass survival, growth, and expansion by reducing environmental stress, especially during early establishment.
  • Effectiveness is strongly context-dependent: Benefits are highest in moderately stressful (hydrodynamically exposed) environments, but can become neutral or even negative under low stress, and insufficient under extreme stress.
  • Belowground mimicry outperforms aboveground structures: Simulated root mats were more effective than canopy mimics, particularly when aboveground structures did not accurately replicate natural flexibility.
  • Restoration requires site-specific understanding: Success depends on matching species traits, environmental conditions, and stress levels, highlighting the importance of self-facilitation and density-dependent thresholds in restoration design.
van der Heide et al 2020 Coastal restoration success via emergent trait-mimicry is context dependent
Coastal restoration success via emergent trait-mimicry is context dependent
Seagrass and hydrodynamics research
Understand what drives seagrass restoration succeess

Read more articles on seagrass restoration

Water residence time controls the feedback between seagrass, sediment and light: implications for restoration

20. Water residence time controls the feedback between seagrass, sediment and light: implications for restoration

Journal Papers
Adams M, Ghisalberti M, Lowe R, Callaghan DP, Baird M, Infantes E, O'Brien K
Advances in Water Resources, 117: 14-26
Publication year: 2018
Seagrass restoration Halodule uninervis Mozambique Inhaca

55. Restoring Halodule uninervis: Evaluating planting methods and biodiversity

Journal Papers
Cossa D, Cossa M, Nhaca J, Timba I, Chunguane Y, Vetina A, Macia A, Gullström M, Infantes E
Restoration Ecology, 33(3): e14382
Publication year: 2025
Trait-based biomimicry amplifies coastal restoration success

25. Mimicry of emergent traits amplifies coastal restoration success

Journal Papers
Temmink RJM, Christianen MJA, Fivash GS, Angelini C, Boström C, Didderen K, Engel SM, Esteban N, Gaeckle JL, Gagnon K, Govers LL, Infantes E, van Katwijk MM, Kipson S, Lamers LPM, Lengkeek W, Silliman BR, van Tussenbroek BI, Unsworth RKF, Yaakub SM, Bouma TJ, van der Heide T
Nature Communications, 11:3668 (2020)
Publication year: 2020
Feedbacks seagrass restoration

18. Local regime shifts prevent natural recovery and restoration of lost eelgrass beds along the Swedish west coast

Journal Papers
Moksnes P-O, Eriander L, Infantes E, Holmer M
Estuaries and Coasts, 41(6): 1712–1731
Publication year: 2018
Zostera marina seagrass

53. Fish community structure and habitat complexity in restored and natural eelgrass meadows

Journal Papers
Castro-Fernández J, Terrados J, Hinz H, Castejón-Silvon I, Moksnes P-O, Infantes E
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwaters Ecosystems, 35:e70092, DOI: 10.1002/aqc.70092
Publication year: 2025
Seedlings of eelgrass Zostera marina

12. Eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) restoration methods on the west coast of Sweden using seeds

Journal Papers
Infantes E, Eriander L, Moksnes P-O
Marine Ecology Progress Series 546: 31-45
Publication year: 2016